Why the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation isn’t Nato for Iran

Central Asia is tilting more decisively towards China as geopolitical uncertainty deepens, with Beijing’s expanding influence recasting the former Soviet states’ strategic orientation. In the final instalment of a three-part series, Cao Jiaxuan examines how Central Asian members of the Shanghai Coop

South China Morning Post
75
2 min read
0 views
Why the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation isn’t Nato for Iran

Central Asia is tilting more decisively towards China as geopolitical uncertainty deepens, with Beijing’s expanding influence recasting the former Soviet states’ strategic orientation. In the final instalment of a three-part series, Cao Jiaxuan examines how Central Asian members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation have shaped the bloc’s response to the US-Iran conflict. Read the first part here and the second part here.

As Kyrgyzstan gears up to host the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in August, the US-Iran conflict is testing the bloc’s ability to respond to a major external crisis involving a member state without undermining its defining principles.

While some observers have suggested the bloc could take a decisive coordinated stance, analysts said such expectations were unlikely to be met, not because the bloc was ineffective but because restraint was built into its design.

Iran became a full member of the SCO in July 2023. It has viewed the bloc, led by China and Russia, as an important platform to break free from US-led diplomatic isolation amid long-standing Western economic sanctions.

But Iran’s high tensions with the United States and Israel have cast uncertainty over the SCO’s regional agenda, with the conflict in the Middle East remaining unresolved even as a Pakistan-mediated fragile ceasefire enters its eighth week.

01:01

Trump says Xi offered help on Iran as China seeks to keep Hormuz open

According to an Axios report on Thursday, Washington and Tehran have reached a tentative agreement on a memorandum of understanding to extend the ceasefire by 60 days and facilitate formal negotiations, though US President Donald Trump has yet to give his final approval.

Original Source

South China Morning Post

Share this article

Related Articles

How US defence chief Hegseth softened his tone towards China after Xi-Trump meeting
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

How US defence chief Hegseth softened his tone towards China after Xi-Trump meeting

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth softened his tone towards China in his speech on Saturday to the Shangri-La defence forum compared with the previous year. Speaking two weeks after the meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in Beijing, Hegseth also adopted a cautious stance on US ar

circa 13 ore fa1 min
US not 'turning back' on Asia allies, but expects them to boost defence - Hegseth
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
BBC News - Asia

US not 'turning back' on Asia allies, but expects them to boost defence - Hegseth

The US defense secretary is questioned about US commitment, including further arms deals, at an Asian security summit in Singapore.

circa 14 ore fa4 min
Chinese scientists create ‘kill-them-all’ algorithm for drone warfare
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

Chinese scientists create ‘kill-them-all’ algorithm for drone warfare

A research team from northwestern China has released a new algorithm that could fundamentally change how drone swarms hunt and destroy enemy targets. The algorithm, known as HG-STR (Heterogeneous Graph Spatio-Temporal Reasoning), promises to allow a fleet of fixed-wing drones to autonomously search

circa 16 ore fa1 min
‘Clear-eyed’ on China: the takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s Shangri-La speech
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

‘Clear-eyed’ on China: the takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s Shangri-La speech

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday morning, just two weeks after a summit between the presidents of China and the United States. The speech was expected to be a barometer of the summit’s outcomes between President Xi Jinping and his US

circa 17 ore fa1 min