Enab Baladi – Amir Hakouk
Amid rising regional tensions alongside the Israeli-Iranian war, an escalatory tone has recently emerged from Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces toward Syria.
This escalation was preceded by Syrian military movements along the borders with Iraq and Lebanon aimed at securing its frontiers, as well as intensive political contacts conducted by President Ahmad al-Sharaa with regional leaders, including the Iraqi president, to contain the war’s repercussions.
As some figures and leaders within the Popular Mobilization adopted sharp rhetoric toward the new Syrian authorities, which have chosen neutrality regarding the Israeli-Iranian escalation, the Iraqi government has been careful not to adopt this tone officially.
This escalation, intersecting with deep political and security shifts in the region, raises questions about its underlying causes, its impact on relations between Baghdad and Damascus, and the extent to which it may influence trajectories of de-escalation or further escalation.
Following the launch of Israel’s “Roar of the Lion” operation against Iran on February 28, US President Donald Trump announced the start of “major combat operations” in parallel.
Iran responded militarily, targeting Israeli military sites and US bases in Gulf countries. This coincided with Iran-aligned factions in Baghdad launching attacks on facilities linked to Washington in Iraq, most notably the US embassy in Baghdad.
Syria exits Iran’s strategic depth
The roots of the escalation lie in shifts within Syria. “Iran’s arms in the region have begun to view Syria as a state opposed to its project. The new Syria has exited Iran’s strategic depth and has therefore moved to the opposite camp,” according to political writer Darwish Khalifa.
In an interview with Enab Baladi, Khalifa said this shift has been accompanied by a growing conviction within this coalition that Syria has moved closer to the Western camp, particularly the United States, which has intensified pressure on Iran since Trump took office in an attempt to limit its regional influence and confine it within its geographic borders.
“These arms, including the Popular Mobilization, act according to Iranian strategies rather than those of their own states. They are functional projects serving other powers,” Khalifa added.
“Some Iran-linked forces are attempting to shift tensions to land borders after the militarization of maritime routes, by trying to heat up the Iraqi-Syrian border, which could lead to unintended clashes.”
Darwish Khalifa
Political writer
In contrast, Iraqi political analyst and researcher Mohammed Nasser Turki offered a different reading focused on the security dimension. He said Iraq, following recent changes, seeks to protect its territory and secure its borders with Syria, which extend over more than 600 kilometers.
“Iraq has suffered greatly from terrorism, especially from the Islamic State group. It has therefore deployed forces and established barriers to prevent infiltration or smuggling from the Syrian side. This explains the recent movements,” Turki said.
Border concerns over escalation
The escalation by the Popular Mobilization Forces raises questions about whether it could lead to real political tension between Baghdad and Damascus, or remain within the bounds of unofficial positions.
Darwish Khalifa warned of the trajectory, stating that “there are attempts to heat up the border between the two sides, which could push matters to the brink between the two countries.”
He added that opening new fronts could reflect on Syria’s الداخل and reignite conflict once again.
Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa receives Iraqi intelligence chief Hamid al-Shatri, August 28, 2025 (Syrian Presidency)



