Why Trump’s Pentagon Abandoned ‘Indo-Pacific’

A military name change signals a broader strategic and diplomatic shift.

Foreign Policy
75
10 min read
0 views
Why Trump’s Pentagon Abandoned ‘Indo-Pacific’

A military name change signals a broader strategic and diplomatic shift.

By Derek Grossman, a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Southern California.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump meet with journalists at the White House in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump meet with journalists at the White House in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump meet with journalists at the White House in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025. JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Get audio access with any FP subscription.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

June 17, 2026, 2:45 PM

In a surprise move this week, the U.S. Defense Department announced that Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM)—the Hawaii-based headquarters for all U.S. armed forces in the Pacific and eastern Indian oceans—would revert to its original name, Pacific Command, or PACOM. The Pentagon argued, “Restoring the legacy [of the] USPACOM designation honors the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific.” This may be true, but it’s at least equally true that returning to the original name aligns more comfortably with U.S. President Donald Trump’s desire to tone down competition against China in favor of engagement and deal-making.

Indeed, it was Trump himself who, during his first term in 2018, decided to change the name from PACOM to INDOPACOM. Speaking on Trump’s behalf, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis noted that the new designation reflected “the increasing connectivity between the Indian and Pacific oceans.” The switch did not alter the command’s geographic area of responsibility, stretching from the U.S. West Coast to the waters off India—or “Hollywood to Bollywood,” as former commander Harry Harris used to say. Rather, the name change bolstered the first Trump administration’s vision of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” which Trump first announced during his visit to Vietnam in 2017. That vision—which then became official U.S. strategy—originally came from former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who wanted democratic countries, including Australia, India, Japan, and the United States, to work together to prevent authoritarian China from converting the South China Sea into “Lake Beijing.”

In a surprise move this week, the U.S. Defense Department announced that Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM)—the Hawaii-based headquarters for all U.S. armed forces in the Pacific and eastern Indian oceans—would revert to its original name, Pacific Command, or PACOM. The Pentagon argued, “Restoring the legacy [of the] USPACOM designation honors the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific.” This may be true, but it’s at least equally true that returning to the original name aligns more comfortably with U.S. President Donald Trump’s desire to tone down competition against China in favor of engagement and deal-making.

Indeed, it was Trump himself who, during his first term in 2018, decided to change the name from PACOM to INDOPACOM. Speaking on Trump’s behalf, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis noted that the new designation reflected “the increasing connectivity between the Indian and Pacific oceans.” The switch did not alter the command’s geographic area of responsibility, stretching from the U.S. West Coast to the waters off India—or “Hollywood to Bollywood,” as former commander Harry Harris used to say. Rather, the name change bolstered the first Trump administration’s vision of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” which Trump first announced during his visit to Vietnam in 2017. That vision—which then became official U.S. strategy—originally came from former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who wanted democratic countries, including Australia, India, Japan, and the United States, to work together to prevent authoritarian China from converting the South China Sea into “Lake Beijing.”

For the first Trump administration, the term Indo-Pacific also connoted leveraging stronger ties not just with India, but across the Indian Ocean region and with friendly littoral and island states in Southeast Asia and Oceania. The plan was to force Beijing to divert some of its attention and resources away from its sovereignty disputes over Taiwan, the East China Sea, and the South China Sea. Ultimately, the Indo-Pacific became the organizing concept for a U.S. grand strategy focused on balancing China’s growing power and influence.

But the second Trump administration’s decision to revert to PACOM suggests something different: not necessarily an accommodation of China’s goals in the region, but a departure from the strategic logic that underpinned the Indo-Pacific concept in the first place.

More than anything else, the original INDOPACOM designation reflected Washington’s belief that India would play a central role in balancing China’s rise. The term “Indo-Pacific” was intended to elevate the strategic importance of the Indian Ocean, strengthen ties with New Delhi, and encourage greater cooperation among like-minded powers stretching from East Africa to the Western Pacific. The goal was to constrain Chinese influence across multiple theaters rather than only in East Asia.

Today, however, those assumptions no longer appear central to Trump’s foreign policy. Although India remains an important partner, Trump has repeatedly signaled that it no longer enjoys the privileged position it once held in U.S. strategic thinking. Since last summer, Trump has demonstrated a willingness to risk serious tensions with India in pursuit of other objectives. He was angered by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s refusal to support his Nobel Peace Prize aspirations following a four-day war between India and Pakistan, which Trump claimed to have helped resolve. Last year, his administration pressured India over purchases of sanctioned Russian oil and Trump expressed frustration over disagreements about a bilateral trade agreement. Last year, he reportedly canceled his participation in a planned Quad summit in India because of these frictions, bringing embarrassment to New Delhi.

Trump has further cultivated closer ties with Pakistan despite long-standing Indian concerns about Islamabad’s relationship with terrorist groups. Most notably, Trump has relied heavily on Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir as a key intermediary in U.S.-Iran diplomacy, elevating Islamabad’s importance at a time when relations with New Delhi have become increasingly strained.

Trump’s decision to restore PACOM also comes on the heels of his highly publicized trip to Beijing last month, where he sought to stabilize relations with Chinese President Xi Jinping after months of tensions over tariffs, technology restrictions, and the conflict with Iran. Rather than emphasizing strategic rivalry, Trump focused on areas of potential cooperation, including trade, energy security, and regional stability. Both leaders portrayed the visit as a reset in bilateral relations, reviving the leader-to-leader diplomacy that characterized much of Trump’s first term.

While major disagreements remain unresolved, the Beijing summit reinforced the perception that Trump increasingly prefers one-on-one engagement and transactional deal-making with Xi over organizing broad regional coalitions designed to constrain China’s rise. Viewed in that light, the return to PACOM appears consistent with a broader effort to reduce the prominence of the Indo-Pacific framework as the defining lens for U.S. policy toward China.

While officials still occasionally invoke the Indo-Pacific concept, the administration’s language has increasingly emphasized economic relations and power balance in the Asia-Pacific rather than the coalition-based Indo-Pacific framework that Trump himself championed during his first term. Notably, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not use Indo-Pacific during his speech at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue conference in Singapore last month.

Abandoning the INDOPACOM label may be less about geography than strategy. The move suggests an administration that is less focused on building a long-term coalition to balance China and more interested in pursuing transactional relationships that advance immediate diplomatic and economic objectives.

To be sure, PACOM’s restoration will not change military operations, force posture, or the command’s area of responsibility. Yet names are rarely just names in strategy. The Indo-Pacific concept embodied a vision of India as a pivotal partner, coalition-building as a source of strength, and sustained competition with China as the defining challenge of the century. By restoring PACOM, Trump may be signaling that those assumptions no longer guide Washington’s strategy to the same extent they once did.

This post is part of FP’s ongoing coverage of the Trump administration. Follow along here.

  • Geopolitics
  • China
  • India

    Derek Grossman is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Southern California, the founder and chief analyst of Indo-Pacific Solutions, a former analyst at the Rand Corp., and a former daily intelligence briefer to the U.S. assistant secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs. X: @DerekJGrossman

    Read More

    Quad summit in Wilmington, Delaware, in 2024
    Quad summit in Wilmington, Delaware, in 2024

    The Quad Is on the Brink of Extinction

    It is hard to imagine the grouping enduring another two and a half years of Trump.

    Stories Readers Liked

  • Go to slide 1
  • Go to slide 2
  • Go to slide 3
  • Go to slide 4
  • Go to slide 5
  • Go to slide 6
  • Go to slide 7
  • Go to slide 8
  • Go to slide 9
  • Go to slide 10
    A creative illustration against a pale yellow background showing a garden planter containing a dense green hedge. Five human arms emerge from the hedge, with four of the hands holding small flags of China, Russia, the United States, and the European Union, while the fifth hand holds the flag of India.
    A creative illustration against a pale yellow background showing a garden planter containing a dense green hedge. Five human arms emerge from the hedge, with four of the hands holding small flags of China, Russia, the United States, and the European Union, while the fifth hand holds the flag of India.
  • Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he walks off stage at the end of a campaign rally at the Santander Arena on November 04, 2024 in Reading, Pennsylvania.
    Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he walks off stage at the end of a campaign rally at the Santander Arena on November 04, 2024 in Reading, Pennsylvania.
  • Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Zhang Shengmin raises his right hand in a salute to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is walking a level lower in a red-carpeted auditorium.
    Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Zhang Shengmin raises his right hand in a salute to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is walking a level lower in a red-carpeted auditorium.
  • An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar.
    An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar.
  • A man in a white collared shirt raises his right hand as if taking an oath or being sworn in. The image is a black-and-white, close-up shot of his profile.
    A man in a white collared shirt raises his right hand as if taking an oath or being sworn in. The image is a black-and-white, close-up shot of his profile.
  • Visitors walk by a world map carved in stone at a plaza in southwest China's Chongqing municipality on May 19, 2010.
    Visitors walk by a world map carved in stone at a plaza in southwest China's Chongqing municipality on May 19, 2010.
  • An illustration with a world map background texture and fire cutting through three rings in the map with three human figures inside.
    An illustration with a world map background texture and fire cutting through three rings in the map with three human figures inside.
  • An illustration shows semiconductor chips structured like a house of cards with a tiny city with government buildings atop it, ready to topple.
    An illustration shows semiconductor chips structured like a house of cards with a tiny city with government buildings atop it, ready to topple.
  • An illustration collage featuring a profile portrait of a man in a suit on the right side. The left side shows a stylized orange silhouette of his head containing the Great Seal of the United States. The background consists of a dark map of the Middle East with various locations labeled, including Turkey, Syria, Israel, and Iran. The overall color palette uses dark tones with high-contrast red and white accents.
    An illustration collage featuring a profile portrait of a man in a suit on the right side. The left side shows a stylized orange silhouette of his head containing the Great Seal of the United States. The background consists of a dark map of the Middle East with various locations labeled, including Turkey, Syria, Israel, and Iran. The overall color palette uses dark tones with high-contrast red and white accents.
  • Two dozen or so scattered pedestrians walking on a large plaza are seen from overhead. There is a giant world map embedded in the pavement, with China highlighted in a dark red and all the other countries in pale gray.
    Two dozen or so scattered pedestrians walking on a large plaza are seen from overhead. There is a giant world map embedded in the pavement, with China highlighted in a dark red and all the other countries in pale gray.

    U.S.-Iran Peace Deal
    U.S. President Donald Trump is seen talking while sitting near a United States flag.
    U.S. President Donald Trump is seen talking while sitting near a United States flag.

    What We Do and Don’t Know About the U.S.-Iran Peace Deal

    Key issues, like Iran’s nuclear program, remain unresolved. This article has an audio recording

    U.S. President Donald Trump, in a blue suit and black shoes, walks across a green lawn in front of the Marine One helicopter.
    U.S. President Donald Trump, in a blue suit and black shoes, walks across a green lawn in front of the Marine One helicopter.
  • A wide-angle, eye-level photograph captures a tall gas station sign towering over a city street at dusk. The sign features a corporate logo at the top, a "Food Mart" label, and a digital price board displaying fuel rates starting with the number seven. A "Propane" label sits at the bottom of the sign. To the right, the illuminated canopy of the gas station covers several fuel pumps. In the foreground, a white vehicle passes by, blurred by motion. To the left, a multi-lane city street is filled with traffic, including cars and a public bus. The background features palm trees, city buildings, and a pale sky at twilight.
    A wide-angle, eye-level photograph captures a tall gas station sign towering over a city street at dusk. The sign features a corporate logo at the top, a "Food Mart" label, and a digital price board displaying fuel rates starting with the number seven. A "Propane" label sits at the bottom of the sign. To the right, the illuminated canopy of the gas station covers several fuel pumps. In the foreground, a white vehicle passes by, blurred by motion. To the left, a multi-lane city street is filled with traffic, including cars and a public bus. The background features palm trees, city buildings, and a pale sky at twilight.
  • U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he speaks about the conflict in Iran in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington on April 6.
    U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he speaks about the conflict in Iran in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington on April 6.

    Original Source

    Foreign Policy

    Share this article

    Related Articles

    Cogs of War Turns One
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    War on the Rocks

    Cogs of War Turns One

    A mentor of mine, a superb scholar, once told me that good defense analysis starts with a trade-off. The classic example is combined arms doctrine, which is the foundation of modern warfare. Infantry, armor, artillery, and aviation work together to offset each other’s weaknesses. Each brings a

    vor etwa 4 Stunden6 min
    Good Medicine Is Combat Power: Clinical Innovation and the Lessons of the Russo-Ukrainian War
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    War on the Rocks

    Good Medicine Is Combat Power: Clinical Innovation and the Lessons of the Russo-Ukrainian War

    War is a brutal driver of medical innovation. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has forced clinicians and commanders alike to confront a hard truth: Survival depends not only on tactics and technology, but on the ability to deliver advanced care under fire, evacuate and resuscitate the w

    vor etwa 4 Stunden11 min
    Multilateralism Is Dead. Long Live Plurilateralism.
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    Multilateralism Is Dead. Long Live Plurilateralism.

    Coalitions of the willing are creating a “race to the top” on climate change, AI, and critical minerals.

    vor etwa 8 Stunden10 min
    Trump Defends His Iran Deal
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    Trump Defends His Iran Deal

    The White House detailed the deal’s terms after Trump defended it at the G-7.

    vor etwa 14 Stunden8 min