From Theory to Reality: Evaluating the U.S.-Ukrainian Minerals Deal

In 2025, J.C. Ellis wrote, “Trump Needs a Plan on Ukraine’s Buried Treasure,” where he argued that Washington should enact a strategy for Ukraine that ensures Ukrainian control and allied access to its storehouse of critical minerals. A year later, after a critical minerals investm

War on the Rocks
75
2 min read
0 views
From Theory to Reality: Evaluating the U.S.-Ukrainian Minerals Deal

In 2025, J.C. Ellis wrote, “Trump Needs a Plan on Ukraine’s Buried Treasure,” where he argued that Washington should enact a strategy for Ukraine that ensures Ukrainian control and allied access to its storehouse of critical minerals. A year later, after a critical minerals investment plan for Ukraine has been established, we asked J.C. to revisit his original argument.Image: MidjourneyIn your 2025 article, you argued that Washington should enact a strategy for Ukraine that ensures Ukrainian control and allied access to its massive storehouse of critical minerals. A few months after your article was written, the United States and Ukraine signed an agreement establishing a reconstruction investment fund, where critical minerals are a large part of the agreement. How does this plan compare to the one you envisioned? Does the agreement sufficiently ensure that both parties benefit economically and strategically? The article, published two months in advance of the Ukraine-United States Mineral Resource Agreement, prefigured an intense debate over the future capitalization of Ukraine’s critical mineral wealth. Most academic analyses and policy commentaries cast the agreement in an unfavorable light: an example of Trumpian “transnationalism” at best, “neocolonialism” and “pure extortion” at worst. The reality is far less nefarious. The agreement established a partnership company — the U.S.-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund — supervised by a six-member board (three American, three Ukrainian) to channel investment to Ukraine’s natural resources sector and related infrastructure. The initiative was kick-started by a $150 million initial capital infusion and, by recent accounts, has gotten off to an energetic start. While the agreement falls short of the wide-ranging, multilateral geoeconomic framework outlined in the article, its structure and goals are seeds of the same strategic logic — one that serves the interests of both the United States and Ukraine.The most important similarities between the two lie in their diagnosis of

Members-Only Content

This article is reserved for War on the Rocks members. Join our community to unlock exclusive insights and analysis.

Original Source

War on the Rocks

Share this article

Related Articles

The Limits of Trump’s Regime Capture Strategy from Venezuela to Cuba
📊Analysis & Opinion
War on the Rocks

The Limits of Trump’s Regime Capture Strategy from Venezuela to Cuba

Since the beginning of the year, President Donald Trump has enthusiastically reinstated regime change as a key tool of U.S. statecraft, despite previously campaigning against the military excesses of former presidents. This drastic foreign policy reversal owes much to his administration’s dram

hace alrededor de 4 horas16 min
How the War with Iran Ends
📊Analysis & Opinion
War on the Rocks

How the War with Iran Ends

Three weeks into the joint American-Israeli military operation against Iran, a pressing question occupies Washington: What will ultimately follow these strikes? The attacks themselves are already degrading Tehran’s military capacity, but the more crucial focus is the aftermath — specific

hace alrededor de 4 horas13 min
📊
📊Analysis & Opinion
RealClearDefense

Pentagon, Boeing Agree To Triple PAC-3 Seeker Production

J.D. Simkins, DNews Boeing has reached a framework agreement with the Defense Department to triple the capacity of seekers for the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment...

hace alrededor de 17 horas1 min
📊
📊Analysis & Opinion
RealClearDefense

Risks of Leaving Iran With No Regime Change

Kris Osborn, Warrior Maven Without regime change, a rebuilt Iran could wield advanced Russian and Chinese weaponry, potentially escalating regional threats despite military losses.

hace alrededor de 17 horas1 min