Operation Epic Confusion

Trump’s goals in Iran are expansive, shifting, and potentially impossible.

Foreign Policy
75
11 min read
0 views
Operation Epic Confusion

Welcome back to Foreign Policy’s Situation Report. It’s been a big week in the world—there’s a new war in the Middle East that’s rapidly impacted the entire region and beyond.

On that note, we’ve got a lot of news for you today. Here’s what’s on tap: Trump’s shifting goals in the Iran war, Kristi Noem’s ouster as Homeland Security chief, and a new U.S. military operation in the Western Hemisphere.


The Iran war is less than a week old, but the Trump administration’s stated objectives in the fight have shifted repeatedly—as have its justifications for launching the conflict (read more on the latter from John here).

In many ways, the administration’s messaging on the war, nicknamed Operation Epic Fury, was muddled before it even began. U.S. President Donald Trump initially threatened strikes on Iran in January over the regime’s bloody crackdown on anti-government protests, but then he started warning Tehran that an attack could come if it didn’t reach an agreement with Washington on the Iranian nuclear program.

Since the United States and Israel began dropping bombs on Saturday, Trump and his advisors have added objectives beyond preventing Iran from building a nuclear bomb. In the process, they’ve often contradicted one another on what the United States is trying to accomplish. Unsurprisingly, a recent CBS News poll suggests that Americans are confused about the war’s aims, with a majority (62 percent) stating that the administration has not yet explained its goals clearly.

Regime change? The Trump administration has fluctuated on whether one of the goals is to bring down the Iranian regime. The war has already seen a number of top Iranian leaders killed, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran is now in the process of selecting a new leader, and Trump has signaled that he expects to have a say. He’s also expressed support for a popular uprising and for opposition groups to take the fight to the regime.

“To the great proud people of Iran, I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand,” Trump said in a video announcing the war on Saturday. “When we are finished, take over your government.”

But in a press briefing on Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted that this is “not a so-called regime change war.” Yet Trump continues to make statements that undermine this. On Thursday, the president told Reuters that the United States must be “involved in the process of choosing the person who is going ​to lead Iran into the future.” Trump also said that he would be “all for it” if Iranian Kurdish militias were to take the fight to the regime. Asked by Reuters if the United States would provide or had offered such forces with air cover, Trump said, “I can’t tell you that,” but he added that ‌the objective ⁠for the Kurds would be “to win.”

It’s an indeterminate approach to regime change, with the president apparently open to a range of outcomes—as long as they are favorable to what he perceives as U.S. interests.

Fluid goals, contradictory assessments. Trump has zeroed in on preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon as one of the primary goals of the war. But his continued and exaggerated assertion that the United States obliterated the Iranian nuclear program with strikes last June weakens his contention that the country posed an imminent nuclear threat.

Trump on Wednesday said Iran was just two weeks from having a nuclear weapon. The day prior, however, Rafael Grossi, the head of the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog, said, “There has been no evidence of Iran building a nuclear bomb.”

Meanwhile, the administration has also said the objectives include destroying Iran’s navy and eliminating ballistic missile and drone capabilities. The latter could be difficult to achieve for a number of reasons, including concerns over dwindling U.S. munitions (which Trump denies is a problem) and the fact that some of Iran’s arsenal is believed to be underground. Actually getting the job done could therefore necessitate ground forces, which is also the case regarding eliminating Iran’s nuclear program. Notably, Trump has not ruled out troops on the ground.

The administration has also offered conflicting assessments of progress on these goals. For example, both Trump and Hegseth have claimed that Iran’s navy is destroyed. “They have no navy,” Trump told Reuters on Thursday. But Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine on Wednesday said that the United States “will continue to strike infrastructure and naval capability” over the next 24 to 48 hours, suggesting that the effort to destroy the navy was ongoing. The Pentagon and U.S. Central Command did not respond to requests for comment on these contradictory statements.

Caine has also said that a goal of the war is to “dismantle Iran’s ability to project power outside of its borders both today and in the future.” This is an extremely broad and ill-defined objective that could be impossible to achieve, particularly if they’re hoping to eliminate all of Iran’s proxy groups in the region.


The Defense Department has named all six service members believed to have been killed in a drone attack on a U.S. operations center in Kuwait on Sunday, releasing the last two names on Wednesday in addition to the four it had released earlier.

They are Chief Warrant Officer 3 Robert M. Marzan (pending official identification), Maj. Jeffrey R. O’Brien, Capt. Cody A. Khork, Sgt. 1st Class Noah L. Tietjens, Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor, and Sgt. Declan J. Coady.

U.S. Central Command has also asked more military intelligence officers to support operations against Iran and is asking the Pentagon to send them to its Tampa, Florida, headquarters for at least 100 days but possibly until September, Politico reported.

Meanwhile on the domestic front, Trump abruptly announced on Thursday that he was replacing Kristi Noem as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security with Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin, with the latter set to take over the role at the end of this month. Noem “will be moving to be Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, our new Security Initiative in the Western Hemisphere we are announcing on Saturday in Doral, Florida,” Trump added in his post on Truth Social. (It is not clear how the switch will actually take place in practice, given that Mullin will need to be confirmed by the Senate, after which his own Senate seat would become vacant.)


What should be high on your radar, if it isn’t already.

Iran war expands. The conflict in Iran kick-started by Saturday’s joint U.S.-Israel attack expanded beyond the territory and assets of those three countries from Day 1—with Arab Gulf countries Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates facing a barrage of Iranian missiles and drones—but has since expanded even further.

A U.S. submarine on Tuesday attacked and sank an Iranian ship off the coast of Sri Lanka “that thought it was safe in international waters,” Hegseth announced in a press briefing. The ship, a navy frigate that was returning from an international naval exercise hosted by India, was carrying almost 130 sailors, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X, calling the attack an “atrocity.” At least 87 people were reportedly killed in the attack and 32 others were rescued, according to Sri Lankan authorities.

Iran, meanwhile, carried out drone attacks against the Azerbaijan-controlled territory of Nakhchivan on Thursday, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said in a statement, damaging the local airport and injuring two civilians.

NATO air defenses in the Mediterranean Sea also shot down an Iranian missile launched at Turkey, the Turkish Defense Ministry said in a statement, raising questions about whether the trans-Atlantic alliance will get involved in the war (NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte indicated on Thursday that it will not, at least as of now). The Iranian missile was reportedly bound for a military base that hosted the U.S. Air Force in Turkey. “We remind that our right to respond to any hostile act against our country remains reserved,” the Turkish Defense Ministry said. Iran has denied responsibility for both the Azerbaijan and Turkey strikes.

Ecuador operation. Even as it continues to fight a rapidly expanding war with Iran, the U.S. military launched a joint operation with the Ecuadorian military against alleged “narco-terrorists” in the South American country. That’s according to an announcement from U.S. Southern Command on Tuesday that was accompanied by a 30-second video of troops getting into military helicopters. “We commend the men and women of the Ecuadorian armed forces for their unwavering commitment to this fight, demonstrating courage and resolve through continued actions against narco-terrorists in their country,” Marine Gen. Francis L. Donovan, commander of U.S. Southern Command, said in a statement. The Pentagon has not shared additional information about the operation, including the role of U.S. troops.


Nepali security personnel are seen carrying sealed ballot boxes.

Nepali security personnel are seen carrying sealed ballot boxes.

Nepali security personnel carry sealed ballot boxes to be transported to a central counting station after polling closed in the country’s general election in Bitramod, Nepal, on March 5. Rebecca Conway/Getty Images


A lot has happened since our lead story in last week’s SitRep, when Anthropic’s relationship with the Pentagon broke down over the artificial intelligence company’s demand the U.S. military not use its models for domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons.

Hegseth last Friday went ahead and said he would label Anthropic a supply chain risk—a designation usually reserved for Chinese companies like Huawei—which means any military contractor that uses Anthropic must stop doing so in the next six months. (The Pentagon officially notified Anthropic that it had applied that label this Thursday.)

Anthropic rival OpenAI (the creator of ChatGPT) then announced its own deal with the Pentagon hours later last Friday, with CEO Sam Altman saying the military had agreed to the same red lines it had rejected with Anthropic. (Trump administration officials disputed that characterization and indicated OpenAI had agreed to “all lawful use” of its technology.) On Monday, following significant backlash to the perception that OpenAI took a deal Anthropic rejected, Altman said the company had added more explicit language against domestic surveillance to its contract. He also admitted that rushing to announce the deal on Friday “looked opportunistic and sloppy.”

OpenAI’s national security lead, Connie LaRossa, echoed that sentiment during a panel discussion at the Aspen Institute’s Crosscurrent conference in Sausalito, California, on Wednesday. LaRossa described the backlash as “unfortunate” in response to an audience question from SitRep.

“It was well known and public that all [major AI companies] were in negotiations with the Pentagon at the same time—unfortunately, timing of everything has everything to do with how the movie ended,” she said. “Our goal was not necessarily to announce our deal after Anthropic’s situation had occurred, but we were negotiating in good faith, and most importantly, we believe that robust competition is needed in this space.”

LaRossa also said that OpenAI had the same red lines as Anthropic. “We were able to secure that in our contract, and we are hopeful that Anthropic will be offered the same contract,” she said.

Sitting two seats from LaRossa onstage was Marina Favaro, who oversees Anthropic’s national security policy and partnerships. Favaro declined to comment on OpenAI’s dealings with the Pentagon but said that Anthropic and CEO Dario Amodei’s position was “well articulated on the public record.” Favaro also touted the company’s “track record” of working in the national security space and with other parts of the government like the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Department of Energy. “We have really great relationships with all these folks, and I think that we just want to continue to support this mission.”


Monday, March 9: Inauguration of António José Seguro as Portuguese president.

Tuesday, March 10: Grossi speaks at the Nuclear Energy Summit.

Wednesday, March 11: Inauguration of José Antonio Kast as Chilean president.


$3.4 trillion—the amount that the United States has spent on countering China’s military since 2012, according to a new estimate from Brown University’s Costs of War project. Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s reported initial assessment and independent estimates both suggest that the war in Iran is costing taxpayers around $1 billion per day.


“This is what the fake news misses. We’ve taken control of Iran’s airspace and waterways without boots on the ground. We control their fate. But when a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it’s front-page news. I get it, the press only wants to make the president look bad.”

—Hegseth in a Pentagon press briefing on Wednesday, complaining about press coverage of the U.S. casualties in the Iran war.


  • 6 Questions About Operation Epic Fury by Daniel Byman
  • The United States Is Still Addicted to War by Stephen M. Walt
  • Iran Is Built to Withstand the Ayatollah’s Assassination by Ali Hashem
  • Original Source

    Foreign Policy

    Share this article

    Related Articles

    How the Gulf Countries Are Responding to Iran’s Attacks
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    How the Gulf Countries Are Responding to Iran’s Attacks

    Abu Dhabi, Doha, and Riyadh are weighing their options.

    hace alrededor de 23 horas16 min
    The Iran War Spills Beyond the Middle East
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    The Iran War Spills Beyond the Middle East

    From Azerbaijan to the Indian Ocean, the conflict’s impact is spreading.

    hace alrededor de 24 horas8 min
    How the Iran War Might Impact Russia-Ukraine
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    How the Iran War Might Impact Russia-Ukraine

    The Middle Eastern conflict could drain Ukraine’s supply of key defensive munitions and push U.S. President Donald Trump to quickly reach a deal with Russia.

    hace 1 día7 min
    The Domino Effect of Operation Epic Fury
    📊Analysis & Opinion
    Foreign Policy

    The Domino Effect of Operation Epic Fury

    The U.S. war on Iran will weaken Islamist groups and embolden the Israeli right.

    hace 1 día8 min