A Foreign Correspondent of Animal Kingdoms

How a headstrong field biologist helped birth the worldwide conservation movement.

Foreign Policy
75
11 min read
0 views
A Foreign Correspondent of Animal Kingdoms

It’s not just humans that are suffering from the Trump administration’s destruction of the U.S. Agency for International Development. For nearly 40 years, USAID was one of the top global funders of international conservation. In December 2024, shortly before its demise, then-USAID director Samantha Power launched the agency’s sweeping new biodiversity policy, which emphasized locally led development and climate resilience as guiding principles for a $350 million annual conservation portfolio.

The seeds of the idea that protecting endangered species is a shared international obligation were planted in the same heady, optimistic era that gave rise to USAID. The early 1960s saw the founding of USAID, the Peace Corps, the nonprofit World Wildlife Fund, and the United Nations Development Program, which became another major backer of conservation. In 1964, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature released its first list of globally threatened species, later known as the “red list,” which remains the benchmark for classifying species as endangered today.

In those same years, as journalist Miriam Horn recounts in her new biography, Homesick for a World Unknown, a headstrong biologist named George Schaller began work that laid the foundation for later global efforts to save species by becoming the first scientist to perform detailed, sustained field studies of once-inaccessible animals in the wild. From Serengeti lions to mountain gorillas, Schaller revealed the lives of creatures long thought monstrous or mysterious. He lived in rustic camp sites for years to document daily behaviors and looming threats, and his work informed later conservation policies as well as today’s spellbinding documentaries.

Schaller, who was born in 1933 in Berlin and moved to the United States in 1947, is widely recognized as the father of modern conservation biology. His work was among the first to tackle, as Horn notes, “the question fundamental to conservation: What does this animal need?” Like a foreign correspondent arriving in a new land and quickly learning the language, customs, and daily rituals, Schaller approached his assignments with near-total immersion, birthing a global movement by peering closer into animal worlds than anyone else had before.


A black-and-white, close-up profile shot of a man looking off to the side. He is wearing a dark, hooded jacket. Behind him is a dense forest of trees and a large, misty mountain peak that rises into a pale sky.

A black-and-white, close-up profile shot of a man looking off to the side. He is wearing a dark, hooded jacket. Behind him is a dense forest of trees and a large, misty mountain peak that rises into a pale sky.

Schaller during his time studying gorillas with Mount Kilimanjaro in the background. Terence Spencer/Popperfoto via Getty Images

The first accounts of Africa’s wild gorillas by European explorers were uniformly terrifying. The 16th-century English explorer Andrew Battel dubbed them Angola’s “monsters.” In the 19th century, the French American traveler and zoologist Paul Du Chaillu described the great apes as having a “hellish expression” and arms that could “tear out the bowels of a man.” “Destroy This Mad Brute!” blared a World War I recruitment poster depicting Germans as gorillas, while the 1933 movie King Kong packed apocalyptic force into its gigantic gorilla-like beast.

So it’s not surprising that his peers thought Schaller was raving mad when, as a 26-year-old biologist, he and his wife, Kay, left New York in 1959 for the Belgian Congo to observe gorillas in the wild for a year. Against all advice, he declined to carry weapons or armor. Other researchers warned him, Horn writes, that “he would be torn limb from limb. All the Great Men of Science said so.”

Not only did he survive, but he transformed biologists’ understanding of both wild gorillas and the possibilities of science itself.

Schaller was bold, but he was also methodical. “My daily routine of observation varied little,” he wrote in his definitive 1963 account, The Mountain Gorilla: Ecology and Behavior. His days were filled with careful observation, detailed journaling, and patient repetition.

Schaller’s first task was to get the gorillas to ignore him. Each day he would locate them in the rainforest, tracking bent blades of grass or chewed bark, then present himself and sit in full view. If he tried to hide, he might be perceived as a threat or a rival. Instead, he hoped to eventually be accepted as part of the scenery. He moved slowly, and if the gorillas moved away, he did not pursue them; if they approached him, he did not run or show fear.

After several months, he succeeded in what researchers call “habituating” the animals to his presence—a practice later adopted and refined by his successors studying great apes, including Jane Goodall and Dian Fossey. The approach enabled the first sustained, detailed, and up-close observations of wild animals. “I could only obtain unbiased data on their behavior if they remained relatively unaffected by my presence,” he wrote.

Gorillas, Schaller discovered, are not brutish or particularly aggressive. Save for the occasional clashes between males challenging each other for dominance, they prefer loafing over fighting and spend most of their time napping and snacking on wild celery and other plants. Other than the odd insect, their diets are strictly vegetarian.

Schaller recorded what they ate, where they slept, how they socialized, how they cared for infants—painting the first detailed picture of their daily lives and what they needed to survive. This information, later expanded by other biologists, would become essential to future conservation efforts. By the early 1980s, the combination of rapid habitat loss and poaching had left mountain gorillas, which only live on forested summits in Rwanda, Uganda, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, critically endangered. The population of gorillas that Schaller had estimated to be around 450 had shrunk to around 250. (Another smaller population, not yet discovered at the time, meant the overall number was a bit larger.) Many scientists, including Fossey, believed they were on the path to extinction.

A man in a green uniform sits on the ground in a dense, leafy jungle, holding a notebook and pen. To his right, a large mountain gorilla walks through the thick vegetation. In the background, several other people in uniforms stand among the trees, observing the scene.

A man in a green uniform sits on the ground in a dense, leafy jungle, holding a notebook and pen. To his right, a large mountain gorilla walks through the thick vegetation. In the background, several other people in uniforms stand among the trees, observing the scene.

Conservation authorities study a mountain gorilla in Bukima, Democratic Republic of the Congo, on Nov. 25, 2008.Brent Stirton/Edit by Getty Images

But the species didn’t vanish. A few years ago, on assignment for the Associated Press, I hiked up a volcano in Rwanda to observe wild mountain gorillas alongside biologist Jean Paul Hirwa from the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund. We stood in a grove of wild celery watching as an extremely patient adult male gently wrestled with a youngster testing his strength, while other gorillas slept nearby. At one point, a female walked past us with an infant on her back, lit by glimmers of sunlight through the dense foliage.

The fact that mountain gorillas are still here—their numbers have even grown slightly in recent decades, reaching over 1,000 in total—is testament to the hard work of many people, including park rangers, biologists, veterinarians, and local conservationists, to preserve their habitat and curb poaching. That’s done not only through monitoring the gorillas, but through making sure people who live and farm near them are thriving and see value in gorillas thriving as well. In Rwanda, a portion of the money made through gorilla-linked tourism goes to support community projects, such as building schools.

The structure of Horn’s book, which is arranged chronologically according to the animals Schaller studied, doesn’t always allow her to fully draw out the long-term impact of his work, but several researchers told me that later efforts to prevent extinctions would have been impossible without Schaller’s pioneering bootsteps or the patient and enthusiastic partnership of his wife, Kay, who typed and organized his exhaustive field notes.

“Schaller was really the first person to do extensive studies of wild gorillas and set the stage for Dian Fossey and later efforts to conserve them,” Tara Stoinski, a primatologist and president of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, told me recently. “You can’t separate the early research and the conservation—conservation is possible because we know so much about how gorillas live.”

Horn does quote several prominent scientists and naturalists attesting to Schaller’s scientific integrity and influential example. The primatologist Amy Vedder, who studied mountain gorillas, told Horn she expected to update Schaller’s works but found them “phenomenally accurate.” David Attenborough told filmmaker Tom Veltre in 2008: “In my youth, you were a scientist if you worked in a laboratory with—dead [or] captured things … The notion that you could get accurate, rigorous scientific data simply by watching in the field scarcely existed, until Schaller.” Had a less fastidious person attempted the work, it may not have had the same impact. But, Attenborough said, Schaller “produced documents of such intellectual rigor that they had to be taken seriously.”

Attenborough added, “He had a stoicism and patience that take your breath away.”

While Schaller could fixate intensely on one animal, he was more of a roving correspondent of animal kingdoms than a lifelong specialist. Even as he developed foundational methodologies that other scientists adapted to study a single species for decades—for example, Goodall’s work on chimpanzees in Tanzania and Fossey’s work on gorillas in Rwanda—Schaller himself moved on, bounding into new terrain with fresh questions.

After leaving Congo, he and Kay moved to India to study tigers for two years, then to the Serengeti to study lions. Later tours of duty included years in Brazil tracking jaguars, in Nepal scouting snow leopards—he guided travel writer Peter Matthiessen on some of these expeditions —and in China studying giant pandas. His observations hold up today, which isn’t true of many early scientific forays. “Half a century later, his monographs on gorillas, tigers, and lions are still relied upon by scientists and conservationists,” Horn writes.


In a rocky, high-altitude landscape, a man in a wide-brimmed hat looks through a spotting scope mounted on a tripod. Next to him, a person uses binoculars to look in the same direction. They are positioned behind a large, lichen-covered rock, with rolling hills and distant mountains in the background.

In a rocky, high-altitude landscape, a man in a wide-brimmed hat looks through a spotting scope mounted on a tripod. Next to him, a person uses binoculars to look in the same direction. They are positioned behind a large, lichen-covered rock, with rolling hills and distant mountains in the background.

Schaller and his team observe wildlife during an expedition to northeastern Afghanistan in 2004. Scott Wallace/Getty Images

For all the time he spent observing other lives, Schaller himself was a reluctant subject. He turned down several requests to aid a biographer before finally accepting the entreaty from Horn, who previously worked for the U.S. Forest Service and the Environmental Defense Fund. Over roughly six years, she interviewed George—who, at nearly 93, continues to write and speak about conservation—and Kay, who passed away in 2023. She also had access to his journals and field notes, and spoke with many of those who knew him well. Schaller was never chatty. “My task, in short, often mimicked Schaller’s: to peer into an opaque creature,” Horn writes. Though mystified by him at times, she writes largely as a kindred spirit, fascinated by the “more-than-human world.”

Thanks to Schaller and his successors, scientists know a lot more today about how to save certain species from extinction. His work helped inspire the creation of numerous parks and wildlife reserves, including Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the Chang Tang Nature Reserve on the Tibetan plateau, and Nepal’s Shey Phoksundo National Park, one of the last strongholds of the snow leopard.

And even as resources and future funding for international conservation are increasingly imperiled, the field has shown some notable success stories, including rebounding, if still fragile, populations of gorillas, as well as pandas, bald eagles, and even elephants in some regions.

One possible criticism of Schaller—and of conservation in general—is an abiding focus on charismatic mammals and birds, perhaps at the expense of tiny or scaly critters that may be more imperiled. Other scientists argue that protecting what biologists call “keystones species,” such as gorillas, also safeguards other animals in their habitats.

Horn does not wrestle in detail with the focus of the larger conservation enterprise, but she does note of Schaller’s legacy, which spanned 32 counties and myriad species: “[N]early every one of Schaller’s species is at least a sliver more abundant and secure than when he started.”

Original Source

Foreign Policy

Share this article

Related Articles

Southeast Asian Leaders Tackle Iran War Vulnerabilities
📊Analysis & Opinion
Foreign Policy

Southeast Asian Leaders Tackle Iran War Vulnerabilities

Global market shocks spark calls for a regional power grid and emergency fuel stockpile.

il y a environ 14 heures8 min
What in the World?
📊Analysis & Opinion
Foreign Policy

What in the World?

Test yourself on the week of May 2: The U.S. announces a drawdown in Germany, Taiwan’s president concludes a foreign visit, and Sudan lobs accusations at Ethiopia.

il y a environ 14 heures6 min
How to Choose a Gift for Trump
📊Analysis & Opinion
Foreign Policy

How to Choose a Gift for Trump

An expert in diplomatic gift-giving describes the use and abuse of official presents.

il y a environ 15 heures12 min
A Confused ‘Animal Farm’ for a Confused Time
📊Analysis & Opinion
Foreign Policy

A Confused ‘Animal Farm’ for a Confused Time

What the latest Orwell adaptation says about our politics.

il y a environ 16 heures12 min