What Did the NPT Review Conference Achieve?

The 11th Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) concluded on May 22. Held every five years, the conference offers an opportunity to evaluate the treaty’s implementation, respond to technological and geopolitical developments, and reinforce states’

War on the Rocks
75
2 min read
0 views
What Did the NPT Review Conference Achieve?

The 11th Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) concluded on May 22. Held every five years, the conference offers an opportunity to evaluate the treaty’s implementation, respond to technological and geopolitical developments, and reinforce states’ commitment to the treaty. For the third time in a row, the conference failed to reach consensus on a final document.We asked five experts for their perspectives on what the conference achieved — or failed to achieve.Read more below.Ankit Panda Stanton Senior Fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Host of War on the Rocks’ Thinking the Unthinkable PodcastWhile the latest NPT review conference concluded without a consensus outcome document, the treaty itself is not broken, but bent. Anyone with a realistic appraisal of where matters stand in the global nuclear order — amid great power rivalries, illegal wars of choice in Ukraine and Iran, and growing proliferation pressures — should be unsurprised at the lack of consensus, despite the best efforts of multilateral diplomats and Do Hung Viet, the president of the review conference. The bigger problem is that every consecutive review conference since 2015 has reached this outcome, suggesting a longer-term process of fragmentation, driven primarily by growing discord among the nuclear-weapon states — chiefly Russia, the United States, and China. By one measure, the fact that, 16 years on since the last consensus document, the treaty’s members continue to view the treaty as the essential load-bearing column of the global nuclear order should be reassuring. But, on the current trajectory, the treaty’s long-term health cannot be taken for granted.Kingston Reif Senior International and Defense Researcher at RANDThe review conference failed to reach consensus on an outcome document — the third consecutive such failure. The proximate cause was reportedly an inability to reconcile Washington’s insistence on singling out Iran’s noncompliance with its

Members-Only Content

This article is reserved for War on the Rocks members. Join our community to unlock exclusive insights and analysis.

Original Source

War on the Rocks

Share this article

Related Articles

Control Without Ownership: How China’s Party-Business Networks Dominate Indonesia’s Mineral Supply Chains
📊Analysis & Opinion
War on the Rocks

Control Without Ownership: How China’s Party-Business Networks Dominate Indonesia’s Mineral Supply Chains

In 2024, when Jiangsu Delong, the world’s second-largest stainless-steel producer, filed for bankruptcy, several Chinese firms and state-owned enterprises quietly absorbed its Indonesian assets. Among them was China First Heavy Industries, a state-owned enterprise founded in 1954 as one of Chi

il y a environ 3 heures15 min
📊
📊Analysis & Opinion
Atlantic Council

Wieslander quoted in Politico

Anna Wieslander, Director for Northern Europe, was featured in a Politico article on Thursday, May 28, commenting on the security situation and the recent Swedish military exercise on Gotland, the strategically located Swedish island in the Baltic Sea. Interviewed by Politico’s Victor Jack, Wiesland

il y a environ 4 heures1 min
A Sea Control Revolution?
📊Analysis & Opinion
War on the Rocks

A Sea Control Revolution?

Sea control has changed. In recent years, there has been a quiet revolution in maritime strategy that has seen navies increasingly expected to exert greater levels of control over more of the world’s oceans, more of the time. Whether it is NATO forces protecting critical maritime infrastructur

il y a environ 4 heures11 min
What Everyone is Missing About North Korea’s Reunification Strategy
📊Analysis & Opinion
War on the Rocks

What Everyone is Missing About North Korea’s Reunification Strategy

When news broke that North Korea had revised its constitution, analysts in the West and across the Korean Peninsula rushed to declare it the formal death of Korean reunification as a policy objective. The changes were hard to ignore. Pyongyang stripped all references to a unified Korean nation, codi

il y a environ 4 heures12 min