With the US, China must choose constructive power over destruction

Foreign affairs are not a series of disconnected episodes. They are a test of whether nations learn from history and act with foresight. The United States has often failed that test. It forgets that unchecked aggression leads to wider wars and that removing governments without building new authority

South China Morning Post
75
2 min read
0 views
With the US, China must choose constructive power over destruction

Foreign affairs are not a series of disconnected episodes. They are a test of whether nations learn from history and act with foresight. The United States has often failed that test. It forgets that unchecked aggression leads to wider wars and that removing governments without building new authority invites chaos.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Iran’s destabilising role in the Middle East and the collapse of Libya and Afghanistan all testify to what happens when those lessons are ignored.

China, by contrast, has not waged wars of conquest or slaughtered civilians abroad. Its rise has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty and reshaped trade. Yet Beijing’s sharp focus on Taiwan, while understandable from its perspective, risks narrowing its vision. China still depends on the global trading system.

That system requires stability, and stability requires accommodation with the US, however pushy Washington may seem.

Iran is a case in point. Beijing has not actively helped Tehran prolong conflict, though it is pushing back against US sanctions over Iranian oil. Active help would entangle China in the very kind of destructive adventurism it has so far avoided. The world needs China to be a constructive power, not a spoiler. If China wants its prosperity to endure, it must resist the temptation in some quarters to side with those who thrive on chaos.

Iran’s partnership with Russia in Syria and support for militias across the region have created humanitarian disasters. China’s credibility as a responsible global actor would be undermined if it lent cover to such behaviour.

China’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, vetoes a UN Security Council draft resolution aiming to boost security in the Strait of Hormuz at the UN headquarters in New York on April 7. Photo: Xinhua

China’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, vetoes a UN Security Council draft resolution aiming to boost security in the Strait of Hormuz at the UN headquarters in New York on April 7. Photo: Xinhua

Share this article

Related Articles

Can China engineer a price recovery that doesn’t make people feel poorer?
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

Can China engineer a price recovery that doesn’t make people feel poorer?

China may finally have a chance to loosen the grip of deflation. Yet, the more important question is whether it can do so without making households feel poorer first. The latest producer price index (PPI), which measures the prices factories charge, brings that possibility back into serious debate.

circa 4 ore fa2 min
China’s ‘super catalyst’ turns waste water into fertiliser building block, tripling output
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

China’s ‘super catalyst’ turns waste water into fertiliser building block, tripling output

A team in China has designed a catalyst that can transform nitrate pollution from agricultural and industrial waste water into ammonia – the chemical backbone of urea fertiliser – with nearly three times the efficiency of conventional catalysts. The study detailing this advance was published on Marc

circa 8 ore fa1 min
Buddhist monk arrested over alleged rape of teen in Sri Lanka
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
BBC News - Asia

Buddhist monk arrested over alleged rape of teen in Sri Lanka

The Venerable Pallegama Hemarathana Thero holds one of the most revered positions in the Buddhist world.

circa 9 ore fa2 min
Rise of China complicates ‘authoritarian’ vs ‘democratic’ binary
🇨🇳🇹🇼China vs Taiwan
South China Morning Post

Rise of China complicates ‘authoritarian’ vs ‘democratic’ binary

There is growing unease in how we describe political systems today. Words that once seemed clear no longer illuminate as they should. “Free”, “democratic”, “liberal” and “authoritarian” are among the most commonly used terms in political discourse, yet their meanings have become increasingly blurred

circa 11 ore fa2 min