U.S. Navy Eyes South Korean Yards for Tankers and Destroyers

In a historic move that could end an 80-year ban on foreign warship construction, the U.S. Navy has officially issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) to major South Korean shipbuilders to assess their capacity to build American destroyers and fleet tankers. Following initial reports from South K

Naval News
75
3 min read
0 views
U.S. Navy Eyes South Korean Yards for Tankers and Destroyers

In a historic move that could end an 80-year ban on foreign warship construction, the U.S. Navy has officially issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) to major South Korean shipbuilders to assess their capacity to build American destroyers and fleet tankers.

Following initial reports from South Korea’s Yonhap News, Naval News can confirm that the U.S. issued two RFIs to Korean yards, one pertaining to the construction of auxiliary vessels specifically medium size/tonnage fuel tankers meant for fleet replenishment, and notably one RFI for destroyer sized surface combatants. These RFIs indicate that the U.S. government is putting forward a more serious effort into the establishment of foreign building for U.S. Navy ships.

Notably, 3 companies have put in responses, with Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries submitting requests for both the tanker and destroyer contracts, and Samsung Heavy industries responding solely to the contract for the at sea replenishment tankers.

Both Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries have previous experience in building the ~8,500 ton Sejong the Great-class of Aegis destroyers, a vessel which is remarkably similar to the Arleigh Burke-class of destroyers in service with the United States Navy, another user of the Aegis combat system. These yards also produced several frigates, including for export customers in the form of Peru and the Philippines, as well as the Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin-class of destroyers.

A Closed Market No More

ROKS Dasan Jeong Yak-yong KDX III Batch 2 HHI
Launch ceremony for ROKS Dasan Jeong Yak-yong, the first of the second batch of Sejong the Great-class destroyers (KDX III batch II program). Korean Yards would likely produce very similar vessels for the U.S. Navy under the RFI. HD HHI picture.

If these RFIs result in an order from the United States Navy, the first foreign built/designed combat ships would enter service with the United States Navy since 1947, with the almost 80 year gap resulting from the last British designed New Orleans-class cruisers leaving post World War. Since then, every U.S. Navy combat ship and the vast majority of the auxiliary fleet has been designed and built within the United States.

This opportunity has likely been the result of several investment rounds by Korean shipbuilders in the U.S. industrial base, including $150 billion dollars committed to the commercial shipbuilding sector by Korea under a joint financing framework. Hanwha has also bought out Philly Shipyard, helping to produce commercial and training vessels for the U.S along with a partnership with Vard U.S. Marine as a subcontractor for design work on the Next Generation Logistics Ship.

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2027, the Navy’s released 5 year shipbuilding plan, and the FY 2027 budget (which Naval News has previously reported on) all contained references towards allowing foreign built ships in the Navy, with this RFI being the first major step.

However, to fully allow this policy to result in ships, Congress needs to authorize a national security waiver and appropriate the requested funds, with at least some opposition likely. Additionally, it is currently unknown whether or not this is a permanent policy change, especially with the recent massive recapitalization efforts and funding poured into the American maritime industrial base.

Original Source

Naval News

Share this article

Related Articles

🔬
🔬Weapons & Technology
Defence Blog

Neros develops a low-cost interceptor drone

The company that helped supply Ukraine’s front lines with cheap, mass-produced attack drones just announced it is racing to build the exact opposite: a drone built specifically to hunt and kill other drones. Neros Technologies posted a video on July 10 showing early testing of what the company

há aproximadamente 4 horas1 min
🔬
🔬Weapons & Technology
Defence Blog

U.S. Air Force to upgrade plane missile defense system

A shoulder-fired missile streaking toward a military cargo plane has mere seconds to find its target, and the U.S. Air Force has paid $60.4 million to make sure the aircraft sees it coming even faster. Northrop Grumman won a $60,438,241 contract to develop an enhanced sensor called the Optical Detec

há aproximadamente 4 horas1 min
🔬
🔬Weapons & Technology
Defence Blog

Türkiye reportedly sold its Russian S-400 system to the Gulf

Türkiye has reportedly sold its Russian-made S-400 air defense system to a Gulf state, according to Hürriyet columnist Abdülkadir Selvi, whose report ties the transaction directly to Türkiye’s yearslong effort to escape American sanctions and potentially reopen the door to purchasing F-35 figh

há aproximadamente 4 horas1 min
🔬
🔬Weapons & Technology
Defence Blog

X-Bow lands $11M to build Pentagon’s next rocket motor

For decades, only two American companies could build the powerful solid rocket motors that launch the Pentagon’s biggest missiles into the sky, and the Missile Defense Agency just handed nearly $11 million to a New Mexico firm trying to break that monopoly wide open. X-Bow Launch Systems, base

há aproximadamente 4 horas1 min